A smaller docs team needs to document the bulk invoice editor for release 26.4. A thin ticket and a demo video leave room for plausible guesses. An agentic workflow needs source checks, content models, technical certification, and final documentation judgment.
See the comparisonDocument the new bulk invoice editor for release 26.4.
The same new feature needs documentation in both cases. The workflow changes whether incomplete sources reach generation and whether technical and editorial review have distinct gates.
Generation begins without verified limits, roles, and error behavior.
The draft fills gaps with plausible steps that downstream assistants may repeat.
Sources pass the rubric before topics and their map are generated.
The product expert certifies accuracy; a documentation professional checks the collection and decides placement.
This scenario covers a collection of new topics and its place in the existing corpus. It includes drafting, but the business result depends on certification, structure, placement, and publication.
Generation waits for the source package to pass.
Experts check technical completeness and accuracy.
Documentation professionals review and place the topics.
Publish with the feature and inspect subsequent problems.
Track whether the required collection is approved, placed, and available when the feature is released.
Start the clock at a defined intake milestone and record time waiting for missing sources separately. Compare features with similar documentation scope.
Assess release readiness with total writer, expert, review, and rework effort. Check documentation-related tickets after release. A fast first draft is not the same as complete docs, lower cost, or a successful release.
Content models and source rubrics make expectations explicit. The source package must establish behavior; technical certification and final QA serve different purposes.
Generation waits until source owners resolve missing behavior and scope.
Maintain source rubrics, topic models, templates, and source rules. Generated topics must meet the same structure and reuse requirements as existing content.
Use approved terms and curated classification values for edition, role, release, and feature. Rule-based checks enforce checkable terms and style rules.
Choose one feature with cooperative source owners. Record the source gaps, technical corrections, final QA changes, and placement decisions across the whole workflow.
The model proposes content. Product experts certify behavior; documentation professionals decide usability, placement, and publication.
See how this scenario works
Intuitive Stack can help define source rubrics, content models, and review gates for a complete new-documentation workflow with your product and docs teams.