Skip to scenario
Back to the business caseWhat a change affects · Implementation

Trace the change, then let owners decide the disposition

A relationship query supports impact assessment by exposing candidates and their reasons. Human decisions determine which content must change and which can remain.

Follow the process
Business goal
Manage risk
Business metric
Cost of quality

Build a reviewable change assessment

Use approved change evidence, stable component and requirement IDs, and a source-linked dependency model. Define disposition and approval responsibilities.

The task in this example

What content does change order CO-1187 affect?

  1. Step 1

    Read CO-1187

    Identify the sensor and tolerance change.

    Product or customer data

    PLM and quality records establish the change and its product scope.

  2. Step 2

    Follow requirements

    Find requirements depending on that tolerance.

    Product or customer data

    Requirements owners maintain authoritative component references.

  3. Step 3

    Query content dependencies

    Find related warnings, procedures, and labels.

    Ontology and knowledge graph

    Return the relationship path and source revision for every candidate.

  4. Step 4

    Draft dispositions

    Suggest whether each item needs revision.

    Model

    Ground proposals in the change evidence and current statement; uncertainty remains visible.

  5. Step 5

    Decide item by item

    Owners accept or revise each proposed disposition.

    People

    Quality and documentation owners record the rationale, including decisions to retain content.

  6. Step 6

    Update and approve

    Route required changes through the quality workflow.

    System

    Track revisions, approvals, and unresolved items before change closure.

This framework provides a practical baseline shaped by experience. Every organization operates under distinct technical and operational realities that require tailored design and governance. While you can adapt these measures independently, we frequently partner with teams to customize governance, integrations, and rollout. Performance outcomes will naturally vary.

Why these content layers matter

Intelligent content

Keep statements and source items addressable, versioned, and approved so a disposition can target the correct content.

Taxonomy

Use consistent component, product, release, and content-type identifiers across systems.

Ontology and knowledge graph

Model component-to-requirement and requirement-to-content dependencies. The path explains why a candidate is included.

Verify the result and handle exceptions

Compare the candidate set with the reviewed expected set and inspect approved outputs for contradictions. Test a missing dependency so the team can see the model’s coverage limits.

Conflicting requirements, incomplete component links, or uncertain applicability require owner investigation. Do not infer that an unreturned item is unaffected without a coverage check.

How we work
with your team

We can guide your team, work alongside it, or deliver the work for you. Combine these approaches as your needs and capacity change.

Lead

Build capability

We guide your people through the work, building capability that stays with your team.

Support

Add specialist backup

Your team owns the work. We provide experienced backup and specialist help where you need it.

Do

Delegate delivery

We handle work that is one-time, specialized, or outside your core business, without adding an ongoing burden to your team.

Build your team's skills with standard and custom courses.

More about our approach

Support for this implementation

Set scope, ownership, and review responsibilities for tracing a change across components, requirements, and content.

Can reviewers see why each item is in the change assessment?

Intuitive Stack can help connect source content to product dependencies and define item-level evidence for quality and documentation review.

Schedule a callReturn to the business impact