Have AI flag a paraphrased permission claim before publication
A proposed AI content reviewer compares draft technical instructions with approved, versioned policy. In an account-export topic, it flags a paraphrase that grants export access to every member even though policy limits it to administrators. Evidence-linked findings help security reviewers correct the claim before publication; deterministic field and accessibility checks run alongside that semantic review.
See the business case- Business goal
- Manage risk
- Business metric
- Audit findings
The task and the failure point
The AI reviewer’s task is to identify a permission claim that conflicts in meaning with approved policy, including “Every team member can download the account’s records.” A separate check reports missing accessible-name information; reviewers verify both before publication.
Editorial and inclusive-language review, accessibility, legal checks, and technical review often run in different places. An automated checker can identify a claim that conflicts with a versioned policy or a missing accessibility requirement. It cannot decide whether a policy exception is authorized or whether the procedure works in the product.
Any user can export account records.
Select ↥ to export.
The content repairAttach the relevant policy citation and accessibility finding to the exact draft locations. Named owners verify corrections or record authorized exceptions before release.
AI semantic finding
Draft: “Every team member can download the account’s records.” AI proposal: “This broadens export access beyond administrators,” with the draft passage and administrator-only policy citation attached.
Confirmed correction and separate control check
Security confirms the conflict and the writer states the administrator requirement. A deterministic check flags missing accessible-name information; an accessibility reviewer tests whether the corrected control instruction is meaningful. The gate records both dispositions.
A comparison worth testing
Hold draft, release, policy revision, model, prompt, and reviewer rubric fixed. Test whether the AI reviewer identifies the paraphrased permission conflict with supporting passages, including wording without the token “export.” Score exact-field and accessible-name presence checks separately; humans confirm fixes or authorized exceptions before release.
The policy record below is the AI semantic reviewer’s comparison source. It defines the administrator-only meaning and applicable release; deterministic checks enforce exact fields while security reviewers resolve model-proposed contradictions.
What the content must carry
Rule record: Account export permissions
Claim: Only account administrators may export records in the current release.
Evidence: approved access-control policy and product permission test.
Checks: flag “any user” claims; confirm the export control has a meaningful accessible name; require an owner decision for exceptions.
Owner: product security. Effective version: current release. Review when permissions change.
From content work to audit findings
AI semantic findings must lead to confirmed corrections or authorized exceptions before the topic is published. Policy check coverage and Review disposition time describe that control; Escaped critical defects and actual documentation-related Audit findings test whether risky claims still reach readers.
How to measure it
Use a fixed evaluation set with paraphrases, legitimate quotations, and approved exceptions; retain model, prompt, rule version, and finding evidence. Count missed semantic conflicts and false findings separately from deterministic control failures. Record signed decisions and test the export procedure before comparing equivalent audit scopes.
Start with a bounded task
Pilot AI semantic permission checks on one governed topic set with a short approved policy corpus. Evaluate known conflicts and valid exceptions before using reviewed findings in a publishing gate.
See the implementation steps Assess your AI readinessWhere could a preventable content defect reach publication?
Intuitive Stack can help prepare approved policy inputs and passage-level AI findings for security review, alongside deterministic checks and recorded publishing decisions.